Suicide And Internet
Suicide
And
Internet
There is increasing
evidence that the Internet and social media can influence suicide-related
behavior. Important questions are whether this influence poses a significant
risk to the public and how public health approaches might be used to address
the issue. To address these questions, we provide an overview of ways that
social media can influence suicidal behavior, both negatively and positively,
and we evaluate the evidence of the risk. We also discuss the legal
complexities of this important topic and propose future directions for research
and prevention programs based on a public health perspective.
Social media is a
relatively new phenomenon that has swept the world during the past decade.
Social media fuses technology with social interaction via Internet-based
applications that allow the creation and exchange of user-generated content.1 Social
media platforms, such as chat rooms, blogging Web sites (e.g., Blogspot), video
sites (e.g., YouTube), social networking sites (e.g., Facebook, Instagram,
Twitter, Google), and electronic bulletin boards or forums, as well as e-mail,
text messaging, and video chat, have transformed traditional methods of
communication by allowing the instantaneous and interactive sharing of
information created and controlled by individuals, groups, organizations, and
governments.
SOCIAL MEDIA AND
SUICIDE RISK
An immense quantity
of information on the topic of suicide is available on the Internet and via
social media. Biddle et al.10 conducted a systematic Web search of 12
suicide-associated terms (e.g., suicide, suicide methods, how to kill yourself,
and best suicide methods) to simulate the results of a typical search conducted
by a person seeking information on suicide methods. They analyzed the first 10
sites listed for each search, for a total of 240 different sites. Approximately
half were prosuicide Web sites and sites that provided factual information
about suicide. Prosuicide sites and chat rooms that discussed general issues associated
with suicide most often occurred within the first few hits of a search. We
should note that this study primarily focused on prosuicide search terms and
thus likely excluded many suicide prevention and support resource sites.
Recupero et al.11 also conducted a study that examined suicide-related sites
that can be found using Internet search engines. Of 373 Web site hits, 31% were
suicide neutral, 29% were antisuicide, and 11% were prosuicide. The remaining
sites either did not load or included “suicide” in the title but were not
suicide sites (e.g., sites for movies and novels with “suicide” in their title
or music bands whose names included “suicide”). Together, these studies have
shown that obtaining prosuicide information on the Internet, including detailed
information on suicide methods, is very easy.
A fundamental
question is whether an association exists between rates of Internet use,
including social media, and population suicide rates. Although limited, several
preliminary studies have begun to address this question. For example, Shah12
conducted a cross-national study that examined the association between general
population suicide rates and the prevalence of Internet users, using data from
the World Health Organization's and the United Nations Development Program's
Web sites. Shah showed that the prevalence of Internet users was positively
correlated with general population suicide rates. Multiple regression analysis
indicated that the prevalence of Internet use was independently associated with
general population suicide rates in men (P = .001) and approached statistical
significance for women (P = .074). Hagihara et al.13 conducted a time-series
analysis with data from 1987 to 2005 and reported a statistically reliable
positive correlation between general population male suicide rates in Japan and
the prevalence of households using the Internet (P < .05). We should note
that the results of these studies cannot be considered conclusive because of
cross-sectional designs and the possibility of ecological fallacy.
There are several
specific ways that social media can increase risk for prosuicide behavior.
Cyberbullying and cyber harassment, for example, are serious and prevalent
problems.14–19 Cyberbullying typically refers to when a child or adolescent is
intentionally and repeatedly targeted by another child or teen in the form of
threats or harassments or humiliated or embarrassed by means of cellular phones
or Internet technologies such as e-mail, texting, social networking sites, or
instant messaging.17 Cyber harassment and cyber stalking typically refer to
these same actions when they involve adults. A review of data collected between
2004 and 2010 via survey studies indicated that lifetime cyberbullying
victimization rates ranged from 20.8% to 40.6% and offending rates ranged from
11.5% to 20.1%.18
Cyberbullying, when
directly or indirectly linked to suicide, has been referred to as
cyberbullicide.14 Hinduja and Patchin19 reported results from a survey given to
approximately 2000 middle school children that indicated that victims of
cyberbullying were almost 2 times as likely to attempt suicide than those who
were not. These results also indicated that cyberbullying offenders were 1.5
times as likely to report having attempted suicide than children who were not
offenders or victims of cyberbullying. Although cyberbullying cannot be
identified as a sole predictor of suicide in adolescents and young adults, it
can increase risk of suicide by amplifying feelings of isolation, instability,
and hopelessness for those with preexisting emotional, psychological, or
environmental stressors.20
A suicide pact is an
agreement between 2 or more people to die by suicide at a particular time and
often by the same lethal means.21,22 A suicide pact that has been formed or
developed in some way through the use of the Internet has been referred to as a
cybersuicide pact.23 Traditional suicide pacts have typically developed among
individuals who know each other, such as a couple or friends.23 A primary
characteristic that differentiates cybersuicide pacts from traditional suicide
pacts is that these pacts are usually formed among complete strangers.21 The
use of online chat rooms and virtual bulletin boards and forums can provide an
unmediated avenue to share one's feelings with other like-minded individuals,
which can be easier than talking about such thoughts and feelings in
person.24–26
The first documented
use of the Internet to form a suicide pact was reported in Japan in 2000. It
has now become a more common form of suicide in Japan,27 where the suicide rate
increased from 34 suicides in 2003 to 91 suicides in 2005.28 South Korea now
has one of the world's highest suicide rates (24.7/100 000 in 2005), and
evidence exists that cybersuicide pacts may account for almost one third of
suicides in that country.29 Currently, a dearth of published information is
available regarding the number of cybersuicide pacts in the United States. The
problem of cybersuicide pacts has gained international attention, however, and more
research is needed to understand social media's impact on the formation of
Internet-based suicide pacts.
The Internet has also
provided a way for people to obtain how-to descriptions of suicide as well as
lethal means to kill themselves. Unregulated online pharmacies outside of the
United States have posed a significant risk to the public.30 For example,
Beatson et al.31 described the case of a man in his 30s who committed suicide
by overdosing on clomipramine bought from an online pharmacy outside the United
States that did not require a prescription. Unfortunately, despite the
development over the past decade of increased regulations and accreditation of
Internet pharmacies through organizations such as the National Association of
Boards of Pharmacy, the fight against unregulated online pharmacies that
distribute unapproved or counterfeit drugs continues worldwide.30
Message boards or
forums have been used to spread information on how to die by suicide. In Japan
in 2008, 220 cases of people attempting suicide via hydrogen sulfide gas
resulted in the deaths of 208 people.32 This suicide outbreak was blamed on the
introduction of the gas-related method on message boards via the Internet.
Family members, paramedics, and caregivers were reported to have been injured
or even killed in attempts to save suicide victims because of the toxic gas
methods used.32
Another concern is
the media contagion effect.33–36 The media's influence on suicidal behavior,
especially suicide methods used, has been well documented,37–43 and social
media may possibly increase the risk of the media contagion effect, especially
among young people. A recent study by Dunlop et al.24 specifically examined
possible contagion effects on suicidal behavior via the Internet and social
media. Of 719 individuals aged 14 to 24 years, 79% reported being exposed to
suicide-related content through family, friends, and traditional news media
such as newspapers, and 59% found such content through Internet sources.
Additional analysis revealed no link between social networking sites (e.g.,
Facebook) and suicidal ideation, but it did find a connection between suicidal
ideation and suicide-related content found on online forums.
Video-sharing Web
sites have also gained in presence and popularity on the Internet, especially
since the creation of YouTube in 2005.44 A primary concern with suicide or
self-harm videos is that they may normalize and reinforce self-injurious
behaviors or cause disinhibition.45,46 Lewis et al.45 examined the
accessibility and content of the most popular YouTube videos associated with
nonsuicidal self-injury, such as self-cutting, burning, and hitting oneself. In
2009, they conducted a search on the keywords “self-injury” and “self-harm” via
YouTube's search option and rated and analyzed the 50 most-viewed character
videos (featuring live individuals) and 50 most-viewed noncharacter videos.
Their results showed that the top videos had more than 2 million viewers and
more than half (58%) had no viewer restrictions, such as requiring viewers to
validate that they are aged 18 years or older. Lewis et al. reported that of
the videos that were retrievable during coding, 42 were neutral (neither
promoted nor discouraged nonsuicidal self-injury, 26 were against self-injury,
23 provided a mixed message (both for and against self-injury), and 7 were
pro–self-injury. Sixty-four percent had visual representations (such as
photographs) of self-harming, specifically cutting. Lewis et al. suggested that
these results represent an alarming trend that may foster communities in which
nonsuicidal self-injury is encouraged and therefore increase the risk for
self-injurious behavior.
Social media
platforms such as chat rooms and discussion forums may also pose a risk for
vulnerable groups by influencing decisions to die by suicide.10,24,47 In
particular, interactions via chat rooms or discussion forums may foster peer
pressure to die by suicide, encourage users to idolize those who have completed
suicide, or facilitate suicide pacts.34 Ultimately, these interactions may
reduce the doubts or fears of people who are ambivalent about suicide. A trend
also appears to be emerging in which people use social media to leave suicide
notes.34,48,49 Suicide notes left by individuals via social media are shared
with the public instantaneously and may influence the decisions of other
vulnerable people who encounter them.
Social media may also
pose a hazard to vulnerable people through the formation and influence of
“extreme communities”50—online groups that promote and provide support for
beliefs and behaviors normally unacceptable by the social mainstream such as
anorexia, suicide, and deliberate amputation.50,51 Similar to users of
pro–eating disorder sites, users of prosuicide sites may find support and
acceptance that they have not found through other means.50Although these online
groups may provide the benefit of support, they may present a risk to the
public by encouraging vulnerable individuals to harm themselves.
In sum, evidence is
growing that social media can influence prosuicide behavior. Because the
Internet eliminates geographic barriers to communication between people, the
emergence of prosuicide social media sites may present a new risk to vulnerable
people who might otherwise not have been exposed to these potential hazards.
SOCIAL MEDIA AND SUICIDE PREVENTION
Social networking sites
for suicide prevention can facilitate social connections among peers with
similar experiences and increase awareness of prevention programs, crisis help
lines, and other support and educational resources.52 For example, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline Facebook page53 had more than 29 300 fans as of November 2011, and the American
Foundation of Suicide Prevention54 Facebook page had more than 77 200 fans. Both of these Facebook pages
provide links to suicide prevention Web sites and hotlines, as well as
information about the warning signs of suicide. We also found 580 groups on
Twitter and 385 blog profiles on Blogger.com designated as
suicide prevention. These social media sites allow users to interact and share
relevant information, stories, and events in their local areas.
YouTube also has many
videos devoted to suicide prevention, including those in the form of public
service announcements. For example, the Department of Veterans Affairs55 produced suicide prevention public service announcements that
encourage veterans and service members to seek help. We also found
announcements from nonprofit organizations and universities that promote
suicide prevention awareness programs at both the institutional and the
national level. Other videos were created by individual users and feature
support and prevention content such as memorials for loved ones who died by
suicide and personal stories of getting help.56
The National Suicide
Prevention Lifeline's lifeline-gallery.org Web site57 features an innovative social media platform in which suicide
survivor stories are presented by animated avatars (a graphical representation
of the user or the user's alter ego or character). Site users can create and
design the appearance of their avatars, write a description about their
personal experiences with suicide, and then record their voices or choose a
computer-generated voiceover to narrate their stories. The site also provides
contact information for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline and links to
other suicide prevention organizations. As of November 2011, users had shared
more than 880 stories. The use of this form of social media provides an
anonymous, personalized, and interactive experience geared toward suicide
prevention.
Well written. I liked how you framed the content.
ReplyDeleteAmazing content 👌 We really need to increase the awareness on this huge topic
ReplyDeleteI wish I could make things better for you
ReplyDeleteI like That line
Great Work
Explain in brief, please!
ReplyDeleteMadarchod isse mai khush rha
DeleteMuch needed information. Greatly framed
ReplyDeleteWell written and explained article.
ReplyDeletenice blog
ReplyDeleteWo sab to theek hai tu ya bata ya konsi bhavna ka sath busy hai tu jo khelna nii aata 😂😂
ReplyDeleteMaja aa gaya. Aag laga di aag. Hila dala. I am still shivering from the thrill of this blog🌚🌝
ReplyDeletenice work ....greatt.......keep doimg such things....love you buddy...from India.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNice Comment
Delete